Flood insurance isn’t exactly a cocktail-party conversation, but if you own property in a flood-prone area or if you’ve ever sat across from a mortgage lender who tells you insurance is required before closing, you know just how critical it is. Right now, the future of that coverage is uncertain.
A coalition of state insurance commissioners is urging Congress to pass a long-term extension of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), along with reforms to improve access, stabilize costs, and encourage growth in the private flood insurance market. Their message? Stop kicking the can down the road. Millions of homeowners, businesses, and entire communities are depending on it.
Why the NFIP Matters
The NFIP has been around since 1968, providing flood coverage where private insurers often won’t step in. More than 5 million policies nationwide hinge on its existence. Without it, many property owners can’t secure financing, and those who do may face massive out-of-pocket risk when severe weather strikes.
In places like Louisiana, Florida, and Texas, NFIP is practically lifeblood. Louisiana alone accounts for 9% of all NFIP policies—about 419,000 households. Think about that: nearly half a million families relying on a single federal program to stay covered against floods.
But here’s the problem: NFIP doesn’t have permanent authorization. Its funding and authority need to be reapproved every few years (sometimes every few months), leading to repeated lapses and shutdowns that create chaos for homeowners and real estate markets alike.
What Commissioners Are Asking For
During a recent FEMA Review Council meeting at the White House, commissioners from across the country—including leaders from California, Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Alaska, Virginia, and New Jersey—laid out their recommendations:
-
10-year reauthorization of NFIP – Enough with short-term extensions. A decade-long renewal would bring stability for policyholders and the real estate industry.
-
Improved flood maps – Outdated maps leave communities misinformed about their risks. Regular updates, with better geographic and structural data, are essential.
-
Support for mitigation – Including premium discounts for resilient construction, tax-preferred savings accounts for mitigation projects, and parity for state mitigation grants.
-
Recognition of private flood insurance – So homeowners who switch from NFIP to a private insurer can return without penalty. Right now, letting an NFIP policy lapse often means losing federal subsidies.
-
Prorated refunds for midterm exits – If a policyholder leaves NFIP midyear for private coverage, they should get a refund for unused premiums.
-
Data sharing – Allow FEMA to share NFIP data with insurers, regulators, and modelers. Better data equals better pricing, underwriting, and risk management.
Why Louisiana, Florida, and Texas Care So Much
Some states carry a disproportionate share of flood risk. Louisiana Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple emphasized that his state knows “firsthand the devastating impact of floods and hurricanes.” Affordable, reliable coverage isn’t a luxury there—it’s survival.
Florida and Texas face similar stakes. With coastlines stretching hundreds of miles and dense development in high-risk zones, a lapse in NFIP coverage can mean thousands of stalled home sales, delayed recovery after storms, and increased financial vulnerability for communities.
The Shutdown’s Immediate Fallout
Here’s where things get really messy: NFIP’s authority recently lapsed due to the federal government shutdown. That means:
-
New NFIP policies and renewals are frozen.
-
Real estate deals are stuck. Roughly 1,300 closings a day that require flood coverage in Special Flood Hazard Areas could be delayed. That’s nearly 40,000 closings a month hanging in the balance.
-
Disaster funding is squeezed. FEMA’s borrowing authority has dropped from $30.4 billion to just $1 billion during the shutdown, limiting its ability to pay out claims after the next big storm.
Industry leaders warn that prolonged disruption could delay disaster response, freeze mapping and mitigation grants, and leave families in financial limbo just when they need stability most.
Flood Mapping: Why It’s More Than Lines on a Map
One of the biggest frustrations for homeowners is the accuracy of FEMA’s flood maps. If your house is drawn inside a Special Flood Hazard Area, you may be forced to buy insurance—even if your property hasn’t seen water in decades. Conversely, families outside the designated areas may skip coverage, only to be blindsided when a “100-year flood” rolls through.
A bipartisan bill in the U.S. House is pushing for map updates every five years with far more detailed geographic and structural data. For homeowners, that could mean fairer premiums, more accurate risk assessments, and fewer surprises when disasters hit.
Private Flood Insurance: A Growing Piece of the Puzzle
Historically, private insurers avoided flood coverage because of unpredictable losses. But in recent years, more companies have begun dipping into the market, offering alternatives that sometimes beat NFIP in price or coverage.
The catch? Current NFIP rules discourage switching. If you move to private insurance and later want to return, you lose federal subsidies. Commissioners are pressing Congress to fix that—arguing that competition in the private market could lower costs and expand choices for consumers, while NFIP still serves as the backbone of coverage nationwide.
Why This Isn’t Just About Insurance
It’s tempting to see all this as wonky policy talk, but let’s zoom out for a moment.
-
Homebuyers are stuck. Imagine finding your dream house, only to have the closing delayed indefinitely because NFIP coverage isn’t available.
-
Communities are at risk. Without affordable insurance, recovery after floods slows down. Families are left waiting, businesses struggle, and local economies stall.
-
Costs shift to taxpayers. If people can’t insure properly, disaster aid costs balloon, leaving federal and state governments (and by extension, all taxpayers) to pick up the tab.
A Personal Perspective
I remember talking to a homeowner in Houston after Hurricane Harvey. She told me the water wasn’t the only thing that nearly drowned her family—it was the paperwork. “FEMA told me my house wasn’t technically in the flood zone,” she said, “but I had four feet of water inside.” Without NFIP coverage, she was left scrambling for federal aid that barely covered repairs.
Stories like hers aren’t rare. They’re becoming more common as storms intensify and rainfall patterns shift. And they highlight why both public and private flood insurance options need to be strong, flexible, and widely accessible.
Final Thoughts
The call from state insurance commissioners to extend the NFIP is more than bureaucratic housekeeping. It’s about creating stability in a country where climate risks are rising and millions of households are exposed.
Here’s what really stands out:
-
A long-term NFIP extension would protect homeowners and buyers from constant uncertainty.
-
Private flood insurance could bring healthy competition, but rules need to be updated so families aren’t punished for exploring options.
-
Better maps and data aren’t just policy tweaks—they’re the difference between families being prepared or blindsided.
For homeowners, buyers, and renters in flood-prone areas, this isn’t an abstract debate. It’s about whether your insurance is there when the water starts rising.
If you live in a flood zone or even near one, the smartest move you can make is to stay informed. Because while Washington debates reauthorization, the next storm isn’t waiting.
